THE GREAT COVID 19 CONSPIRACY STORIES -- 2. THE MEDICAL COVID-19 COVER UP!


 In my blogs so far, I have presented statistical evidence of the catastrophic harm being rained upon the world by harsh Covid-19 restrictions and lockdowns by a callous medical establishment and morally bankrupt government leaders.

HOWEVER, STATISTICS AND THE TRUTH ARE DRY AND UNINTERESTING FOR MOST PEOPLE. THUS, I HAVE DECIDED TO WRITE ABOUT THE INTRIGUING CONSPIRACY THEORIES SURROUNDING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. HERE IS THE SECOND STORY.

 

THE MEDICAL COVID-19 COVER UP! 

THE TRAGIC MISTAKE 

Theorist suggest that the decision to impose harsh lockdowns and restrictions to curb the spread of Covid-19, was largely based on Imperial College projections, put forth by epidemiologist Neil Ferguson. Despite widespread criticism of these projections within the medical community, the pandemic and infectious disease experts who led public health departments around the world recommended the restrictive approach suggested by Ferguson's projections and governments quickly caved in and fell under the spell of this medical miscalculation. There were notable exceptions -- the best known is Sweden.

According to theorist, most of the world news and social media joined in to promote the Ferguson questionable statistics and the ill-thought out medical approach and to label any dissenters as conspiracy nuts and hide their comments or make them very difficult to find.

The conspiracy theory suggests that using the Ferguson projections was one mistake, but the medical world made an even bigger mistake than that. They considered human beings to be only biological entities, just like amoeba, so if you keep the amoeba separated, they cannot spread the virus.

THIS IS HOW PANDEMIC EXPERTS SEE US.



What doctors seem to be ignorant of is that human beings are not AMOEBA -- THEY ARE SOCIAL, EMOTIONAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, SEXUAL, ECONOMIC, AND LOVING HUMAN BEINGS TO NAME A FEW.  

HERE IS WHO WE REALLY ARE. PANDEMIC EXPERTS HAVE DESTROYED THIS!






THE WARNINGS START

Beginning in April, the UN and OXFAM began predicting that since the Covid 19 restrictions had caused a world financial collapse -- transportation systems had disappeared and the food chain in a bumper wheat crop year was unable to deliver food to famine areas of Africa and Asia. It was expected that an additional 120,000,000 persons would die of starvation because of the imposed restrictions.

In May and June 2020, other medical specialist began warning that the medical focus on Covid 19 was killing non-Covid-19  patients. Oncologist objected to cancer biopsies, tests, surgeries, and treatments being classified as "non-emergency" or "elective." A UK study predicted that 3.5 million additional cancer patients would die worldwide by the end of 2020 because of being neglected by the Covid-19 obsessed medical world. It is interesting to note that as of today, only 2.7 million have died of Covid-19 over a 17 month period

Lung, Heart and Stroke, Liver medical specialist; HIV/AIDS advocates, NGOs, NFP organizations, and Heath Charities began warning about the danger of neglecting their non-Covid-19 patients. Some lung specialist were highly critical of the way in which incubation was  being used to treat Covid-19 Victims.

As the year continued into summer and fall 2020 and into 2021, a growing chorus of pandemic and infectious disease experts emphasized the warning that the effects of Covid-19 RESTRICTIONS AND LOCKDOWNS were catastrophic and that the benefits were at best questionable.

Theorist point out that in the US and Europe, hospitals were having to settle lawsuits, specifying criminal negligence, launched by the surviving relatives of cancer patients who died because of postponed treatment, biopsies, or surgery.

The social science community began to blame the rise in suicides, death from domestic violence, and a mental health pandemic on the measures creating social isolation, all for the purpose of containing Covid-19, the mortality rate of which has been estimated to be at a high of 2% to a low of 0.3%.  As a comparison, the mortality rate of SARS was estimated as being 9 to 11%.

Economists were reporting widespread unemployment, loss of livelihoods, increased homelessness, and a potential depression that would make the 1929 stock market crash look like a cakewalk.

THE MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT CONTINUES TO DESTROY THE WORLD

Theorist state unequivocally the public health officials and others in the medical establishment, who supported the restrictions and lockdowns, ignored these warnings. WHY? -- because they were morally bankrupt. THEY FEARED THE FINANCIAL RUIN ONCE THE LAWSUITS STARTED AS MORE AND MORE OF THE PUBLIC REALIZED THE MAGNITUDE OF THE CATASTROPHE THE MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT HAD FOISTED UPON THE WORLD.

Government could easily defend themselves against these lawsuits, simply stating that they were compelled to follow medical advice which led to the restrictions and lock down. In fact, governments could actually sue their medical advisors of knowingly misleading the government with half-truths about Covid-19 in order to protect their own interests as doctors.

The theory goes on -- So doctors continue to post statistics about total number of infections and deaths of Covid-19 -- theorist say that these numbers, especially deaths, are suspect. Rates or other statistic are purposefully removed from medical reports because they would remove much of the fear total numbers engender. Doctors also continue to warn of 3rd and 4th waves, the danger of variants, and anything to stop people from uncovering their fatal mistake.

THE PROOF

Well, in fact, Conspiracy theory is based on supposition, deduction, inference, suspicions, some evidence, and intuition. Like any Great Conspiracy theory about the world, it is very difficult to prove.

If you change the names to protect yourself from lawsuits, there is definitely a bestseller in this conspiracy story. People want to blame someone for the Covid-19 catastrophe. No doubt an academy award-winning movie would follow.

However, one thing is very clear. -- More medical experts are recommending the end of harsh restrictions and bringing a host of other experts to the table to stop the damage to the world caused by the fatal mistake of those who followed Ferguson and destroyed the world as we know it.

 


"The harmful consequences of public health choices should be explicitly considered and transparently reported to limit their damage, say Itai Bavli and colleagues ...

"Lockdowns can also cause long term health harms, such as from delayed treatment and investigations. Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of various types of cancer, for example, can allow progression of cancer and affect patients’ survival. A three month delay to surgery is estimated to cause more than 4700 deaths a year in the UK.13 In the US, delays in screening and treatment are estimated to cause 250 000 additional preventable deaths of cancer patients each year.14 Furthermore, a sharp decrease in the number of admissions for acute coronary syndromes and emergency coronary procedures has been observed since the start of the pandemic in the US15 and Europe.16 In England, the weekly number of hospital admissions for coronary syndromes fell by 40% between mid-February and the end of March 2020. Fear of exposure to the virus stopped many patients from attending hospital, putting them at increased risk of long term complications of myocardial infarction...

"The coronavirus pandemic is far from over. Many countries are already reeling from the effects of the pandemic response as well as trying to cope with additional waves of dangerous infection rates. Governments will have to make difficult decisions that rely on uncertain and changing data regarding the most effective approaches to contain the pandemic. Although the evidence on the adverse consequences of measures to control covid-19 continues to grow,1325262728 there remains a paucity of any such voices in the public and decision making conversation, which seems to convey a dominant narrative of pandemic mitigation at all costs. This is perhaps a reflection of the challenge of the moment, but we must adopt a more nuanced approach to understanding the pros and cons of different approaches.

A “zero covid” goal is neither realistic nor sustainable for most countries. Instead, public health needs to increase its investment into assessing the harms of policy options from different perspectives and to explicitly consider and transparently report the harmful consequences of public choices when deciding on and evaluating public health strategies to combat SARS-CoV-2. Epidemiologists, health economists, social scientists, psychologists, historians, ethicists, among others, must all contribute to these efforts and assist governments in making informed decisions—improving and protecting the health of all communities."

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4074

 

"As the crisis around Covid-19 evolves, it becomes clear that there are numerous negative side-effects of the lockdown strategies implemented by many countries. Currently, more evidence becomes available that the lockdowns may have more negative effects than positive effects. For instance, many measures taken in a lockdown aimed at protecting human life may compromise the immune system, and purpose in life, especially of vulnerable groups. This leads to the paradoxical situation of compromising the immune system and physical and mental health of many people, including the ones we aim to protect. 

"Also, it is expected that hundreds of millions of people will die from hunger and postponed medical treatments. Other side effects include financial insecurity of billions of people, physical and mental health problems, and increased inequalities. The economic and health repercussions of the crisis will be falling disproportionately on young workers, low-income families and women, and thus exacerbate existing inequalities. As the virus outbreak and media coverage spread fear and anxiety, superstition, cognitive dissonance reduction and conspiracy theories are ways to find meaning and reduce anxiety. These behavioral aspects may play a role in the continuance of lockdown decisions. Based on theories regarding agnotology (i.e., the ways ignorance or doubt about certain topics is created by means of withholding or presenting information in a certain way), social influence, superstition and stress and coping, I seek to explain the social and behavioral aspects of human behavior in times of crises. Both the Covid-19 crisis itself as well as the resulting economic and (mental) health crisis are global problems that may require global solutions. I present a model of drivers and outcomes of lockdown behaviors and offer suggestions and a tool to counteract the negative psychological effects by means of online life crafting therapeutic writing interventions."


 
 
 STAY TUNED FOR MORE CONSPIRACY STORIES
 

 
3. USE THE PANDEMIC, NOT TANKS!
 

Comments

Popular Posts